Kränkel As I lie in bed and I have to write a little bit of time - and sometimes no trip report!
If the law is a police state ....
On 9 November vote, the German Bundestag on the storage of all possible data. Here in London we suffer to be observed everywhere and always under the oppressive feeling. Within 10 years England was in the most radical police state in the Western world transformed. But it's not just watching. Also, the recording information about the communication will grow restive. Data retention is on the rise and rushes with quick steps.
By April 2007 the Cabinet approved the draft law on data retention does Justice Minister Brigitte Zypries strengthening of civil rights. Zypries defended the bill so that the state refrain from covert investigations could not, when it came to crime to reveal where they had so far with conventional means no chance. Also, the Constitutional Court considers that the Bedürnisse after storing the data as wichitg. Many people see it differently.
Many professional fields are limited in their activities, especially the journalistic profession, the built in part on a high level of trust is. In 2005, yet all parties of the German Bundestag data retention of communications data are rejected. But in February 2006, CSU and SPD for the first time called for an implementation using a European directive.
According to plans of the CDU, CSU and the SPD, all telephone calls, whether mobile or landline calls and e-mail connections remain up to six months later to understand. "Do not send number" A key to it is no more. Furthermore the current location are stored. We become our flagship private motion profiles. Our personal interests are simply just too öffenltichen interests specifically. Currently
It is not legal to store telephone data, unless the account details are required for billing. Otherwise, the payroll data at the request of the customer with invoices must be deleted (§ 97 paragraph 4, Telecommunications Act). Also, it is still possible to escape from the use of flat rates, to a storage completely. Research soon to keep still largely anonymous, almost unmachbar.
Data retention is hardly serve as the control or prevention of crime or terrorism. Instead, innocent people are made every day under general suspicion. Who wants to analyze the multitude of daily information gained sufficient? As our dear Mr. Schäuble would even still working day and night. Whether terrorists, assassins and other criminals - all these and all the monitoring data is stored for their own actions can make the most. After all, this system will certainly not be error-free, but a lot of unnecessary cost money. Who wants to plan a crime can do so by other means. The highly praised by the anti-terror policy measure can not legimitieren such an intervention into our privacy!
is likely that the monitoring of projects will no longer be stopped, but at least you can make it clear that this project meets a wide rejection. On 6 November will be held nationwide rallies decentralized:
If the law is a police state ....
On 9 November vote, the German Bundestag on the storage of all possible data. Here in London we suffer to be observed everywhere and always under the oppressive feeling. Within 10 years England was in the most radical police state in the Western world transformed. But it's not just watching. Also, the recording information about the communication will grow restive. Data retention is on the rise and rushes with quick steps.
By April 2007 the Cabinet approved the draft law on data retention does Justice Minister Brigitte Zypries strengthening of civil rights. Zypries defended the bill so that the state refrain from covert investigations could not, when it came to crime to reveal where they had so far with conventional means no chance. Also, the Constitutional Court considers that the Bedürnisse after storing the data as wichitg. Many people see it differently.
Many professional fields are limited in their activities, especially the journalistic profession, the built in part on a high level of trust is. In 2005, yet all parties of the German Bundestag data retention of communications data are rejected. But in February 2006, CSU and SPD for the first time called for an implementation using a European directive.
According to plans of the CDU, CSU and the SPD, all telephone calls, whether mobile or landline calls and e-mail connections remain up to six months later to understand. "Do not send number" A key to it is no more. Furthermore the current location are stored. We become our flagship private motion profiles. Our personal interests are simply just too öffenltichen interests specifically. Currently
It is not legal to store telephone data, unless the account details are required for billing. Otherwise, the payroll data at the request of the customer with invoices must be deleted (§ 97 paragraph 4, Telecommunications Act). Also, it is still possible to escape from the use of flat rates, to a storage completely. Research soon to keep still largely anonymous, almost unmachbar.
Data retention is hardly serve as the control or prevention of crime or terrorism. Instead, innocent people are made every day under general suspicion. Who wants to analyze the multitude of daily information gained sufficient? As our dear Mr. Schäuble would even still working day and night. Whether terrorists, assassins and other criminals - all these and all the monitoring data is stored for their own actions can make the most. After all, this system will certainly not be error-free, but a lot of unnecessary cost money. Who wants to plan a crime can do so by other means. The highly praised by the anti-terror policy measure can not legimitieren such an intervention into our privacy!
is likely that the monitoring of projects will no longer be stopped, but at least you can make it clear that this project meets a wide rejection. On 6 November will be held nationwide rallies decentralized:
rally and demonstration in Bremen from 17 clock in the square
